Search for: All records

Montane snowpack in the Sierra Nevada provides critical water resources for ecological functions and downstream communities. Forest removal allows us to manage the snowpack in montane forests and mitigate the effect of climate on water resources. Little is known about the mid- to long-term effects that changing snowpack following forest disturbance has on tree re-growth, and how tree re-growth might in turn affect snowpack accumulation and melt. We use a 1-m resolution process-based snow model (SnowPALM) coupled with a stand-scale ecohydrological model (RHESSys) that resolves water, energy and carbon cycling to represent tree growth, and to quantify how trees and snowpack co-evolve following two disturbance scenarios (thinning and clearcutting) over a period of 40 years in a small 100 m x 234 m mid-elevation forested area in the Sierra Nevada, California. We first calculate the impact of forest disturbance on the snowpack assuming no tree regrowth and then we compare it with scenarios that include the feedback of trees regrowth on the snowpack. Without tree regrowth, snow accumulation and melt volume increase on average by roughly 5 % and 13 % following thinning and clearcutting, respectively. With tree regrowth, a regrowth rate of 0.75 and 1.15 m/decade are found for thinning and clearcutting, respectively, along with a decrease of melt volumes of 2.5 to 0.9 mm/decade, respectively. About 50 % of the snowmelt volume gains from forest thinning are lost after 40 years of regrowth, whereas only about 7 % is lost from clearcutting after the same period, which are largely explained by changes to canopy interception and sublimation. This proof-of-concept study is expected to shed light into the coevolution of montane forests and snowpack response to forest disturbance. 

Abstract Critical Zone (CZ) scientists have advanced understanding of Earth's surface through process‐based research that quantifies water, energy, and mass fluxes in predominantly undisturbed systems. However, the CZ is being increasingly altered by humans through climate and land use change. Expanding the scope of CZ science to include both human‐ and non‐human controls on the CZ is important for understanding anthropogenic impacts to Earth's surface processes and ecosystem services. Here, we share perspectives from predominantly U.S.‐based, early career CZ scientists centered around broadening the scope of CZ science to focus on societally relevant science through a transdisciplinary science framework. We call for increased training on transdisciplinary methods and collaboration opportunities across disciplines and with stakeholders to foster a scientific community that values transdisciplinary science alongside physical science. Here, we build on existing transdisciplinary research frameworks by highlighting the need for institutional support to include and educate graduate students throughout the research processes. We also call for graduate‐student‐led initiatives to increase their own exposure to transdisciplinary science through activities such as transdisciplinary‐focused seminars and symposiums, volunteering with local conservation groups, and participating in internships outside academia. 

Abstract Understanding the severity and extent of near surface critical zone (CZ) disturbances and their ecosystem response is a pressing concern in the face of increasing human and natural disturbances. Predicting disturbance severity and recovery in a changing climate requires comprehensive understanding of ecosystem feedbacks among vegetation and the surrounding environment, including climate, hydrology, geomorphology, and biogeochemistry. Field surveys and satellite remote sensing have limited ability to effectively capture the spatial and temporal variability of disturbance and CZ properties. Technological advances in remote sensing using new sensors and new platforms have improved observations of changes in vegetation canopy structure and productivity; however, integrating measures of forest disturbance from various sensing platforms is complex. By connecting the potential for remote sensing technologies to observe different CZ disturbance vectors, we show that lower severity disturbance and slower vegetation recovery are more difficult to quantify. Case studies in montane forests from the western United States highlight new opportunities, including evaluating post‐disturbance forest recovery at multiple scales, shedding light on understory vegetation regrowth, detecting specific physiological responses, and refining ecohydrological modeling. Learning from regional CZ disturbance case studies, we propose future directions to synthesize fragmented findings with (a) new data analysis using new or existing sensors, (b) data fusion across multiple sensors and platforms, (c) increasing the value of ground‐based observations, (d) disturbance modeling, and (e) synthesis to improve understanding of disturbance.